1980 Audi UR vs. 1968 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1980 Audi UR is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 40 kg more than 1980 Audi UR.
Because 1980 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Holden Belmont. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi UR (286 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Holden Belmont. (246 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1980 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi UR | 1968 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | UR | Belmont |
Year Released | 1980 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 286 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2830 mm |