1980 Audi UR vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1980 Audi UR is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1980 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 850 kg more than 1980 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi UR | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | UR | Calais |
Year Released | 1980 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 109.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 103.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3300 mm |