1980 Audi UR vs. 1996 Nissan Cima
To start off, 1996 Nissan Cima is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi UR would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Cima weights approximately 280 kg more than 1980 Audi UR.
Because 1980 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Nissan Cima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi UR | 1996 Nissan Cima | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | UR | Cima |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
