1980 Audi UR vs. 2002 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1980 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi UR (286 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1980 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi UR | 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | UR | Tracker |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 286 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2210 mm |