1980 Audi UR vs. 2002 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2002 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi UR weights approximately 80 kg more than 2002 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 1980 Audi UR has manual transmission. 1980 Audi UR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi UR | 2002 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | UR | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |