1980 Audi UR vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi UR would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1980 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1172 kg more than 1980 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi UR. (286 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi UR | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | UR | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2422 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |
