1980 Audi UR vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,374 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 220 kg more than 1980 Audi UR.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi UR (286 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 1980 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi UR | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | UR | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2374 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 100 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 59 L |
