1980 Audi UR vs. 2006 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2006 Mazda B3000 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2006 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1980 Audi UR.
Because 1980 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda B3000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi UR (286 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1980 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi UR | 2006 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | UR | B3000 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 286 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 74 L |