1980 Audi UR vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1980 Audi UR. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi UR.
Because 1980 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi UR (286 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 1980 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi UR | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | UR | Commodore |
Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 286 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |