1980 Audi UR vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1980 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi UR (286 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1980 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi UR | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | UR | Matrix |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 286 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |