1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1948 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Studebaker Commander (94 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1948 Studebaker Commander should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 608 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Studebaker Commander is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Studebaker Commander. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 1948 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Austin | Studebaker |
Model | Allegro | Commander |
Year Released | 1980 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 94 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3030 mm |