1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1950 Simca 8
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Allegro (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1950 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1950 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Simca 8 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro.
Because 1950 Simca 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Simca 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 1950 Simca 8 | |
Make | Austin | Simca |
Model | Allegro | 8 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1090 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2430 mm |