1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1953 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Allegro (59 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Triumph Mayflower weights approximately 104 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro.
Because 1953 Triumph Mayflower is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Triumph Mayflower. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 1953 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | Allegro | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1980 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 37 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 954 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2110 mm |