1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1954 Austin A 30
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Allegro (59 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 30. (28 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Allegro weights approximately 170 kg more than 1954 Austin A 30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Austin A 30 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A 30. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Allegro | 1954 Austin A 30 | |
| Make | Austin | Austin |
| Model | Allegro | A 30 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 802 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 28 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2030 mm |
