1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1957 Hudson Metropolitan
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Hudson Metropolitan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Allegro (59 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1957 Hudson Metropolitan. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1957 Hudson Metropolitan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Allegro weights approximately 30 kg more than 1957 Hudson Metropolitan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 Hudson Metropolitan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Hudson Metropolitan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 1957 Hudson Metropolitan | |
Make | Austin | Hudson |
Model | Allegro | Metropolitan |
Year Released | 1980 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 47 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2170 mm |