1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Allegro | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Allegro | 62 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3300 mm |
