1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1963 DKW F 11
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Allegro (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Allegro weights approximately 65 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 1963 DKW F 11 | |
Make | Austin | DKW |
Model | Allegro | F 11 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 889 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 31 L |