1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Allegro weights approximately 52 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Austin | Reliant |
Model | Allegro | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 798 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2290 mm |