1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1967 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Brougham (208 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1295 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 1967 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Allegro | Brougham |
Year Released | 1980 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 208 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 2145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3390 mm |