1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1969 Plymouth Barracuda
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Plymouth Barracuda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Plymouth Barracuda would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Plymouth Barracuda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Plymouth Barracuda (317 HP) has 258 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Plymouth Barracuda should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Plymouth Barracuda weights approximately 655 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Plymouth Barracuda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Plymouth Barracuda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 1969 Plymouth Barracuda | |
Make | Austin | Plymouth |
Model | Allegro | Barracuda |
Year Released | 1980 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 7206 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 317 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2760 mm |