1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1972 Matra-Simca M670
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 (444 HP) has 385 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Allegro weights approximately 170 kg more than 1972 Matra-Simca M670.
Because 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Matra-Simca M670. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Allegro | 1972 Matra-Simca M670 | |
| Make | Austin | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Allegro | M670 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 444 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2570 mm |
