1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1977 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Toyota Mark II (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 380 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1977 Toyota Mark II (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1977 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 1977 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Allegro | Mark II |
Year Released | 1980 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2590 mm |