1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1979 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Allegro (59 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Allegro weights approximately 315 kg more than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Suzuki Cervo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Suzuki Cervo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 1979 Suzuki Cervo | |
Make | Austin | Suzuki |
Model | Allegro | Cervo |
Year Released | 1980 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 539 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 26 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2040 mm |