1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 302 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Allegro | 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Allegro | Cimarron |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2844 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 123 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1152 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2580 mm |
