1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1983 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1983 Mercury Cougar is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 665 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro.
Because 1983 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Allegro | 1983 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Austin | Mercury |
| Model | Allegro | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2650 mm |
