1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1986 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1986 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Fiat Ritmo (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 105 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Fiat Ritmo (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1986 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 1986 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | Allegro | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1980 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 71.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 57 L |