1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1989 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 1989 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 727 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Allegro | 1989 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | Allegro | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4228 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1542 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 57 L |
