1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1991 Caterham Super 7
To start off, 1991 Caterham Super 7 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Caterham Super 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Caterham Super 7 (110 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Caterham Super 7 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Allegro weights approximately 340 kg more than 1991 Caterham Super 7.
Because 1991 Caterham Super 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Caterham Super 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 1991 Caterham Super 7 | |
Make | Austin | Caterham |
Model | Allegro | Super 7 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 110 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2240 mm |