1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 1993 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Renault Clio (148 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Renault Clio weights approximately 185 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Renault Clio (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1993 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | Allegro | Clio |
Year Released | 1980 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |