1980 Austin Allegro vs. 1994 Nissan Pulsar

To start off, 1994 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 265 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Nissan Pulsar (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1994 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Allegro.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Austin Allegro 1994 Nissan Pulsar
Make Austin Nissan
Model Allegro Pulsar
Year Released 1980 1994
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1098 cc 1594 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 44 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 74 Nm 147 Nm
Torque RPM 2900 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 815 kg 1080 kg
Vehicle Length 3200 mm 4240 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2440 mm