1980 Austin Allegro vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR weights approximately 185 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro.
Because 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Allegro | 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
| Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Allegro | CLK GTR |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2680 mm |
