1980 Austin Allegro vs. 2002 Dodge Viper
To start off, 2002 Dodge Viper is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Viper (460 HP) has 401 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Viper weights approximately 1007 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 2002 Dodge Viper | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Allegro | Viper |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 8277 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 460 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1857 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |