1980 Austin Allegro vs. 2002 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 291 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 670 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Allegro | 2002 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | Allegro | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 350 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2620 mm |
