1980 Austin Allegro vs. 2002 Holden HSV
To start off, 2002 Holden HSV is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Holden HSV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Holden HSV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 618 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 2002 Holden HSV | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Allegro | HSV |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 74 Nm | 692 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |