1980 Austin Allegro vs. 2002 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2002 Pagani Zonda is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 498 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Pagani Zonda weights approximately 435 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Pagani Zonda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Pagani Zonda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 2002 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Austin | Pagani |
Model | Allegro | Zonda |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 542 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2730 mm |