1980 Austin Allegro vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,438 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Condor (114 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 782 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Allegro | Condor |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 114 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1632 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2610 mm |