1980 Austin Allegro vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 5,439 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL (494 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 450 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 1214 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL (800 Nm) has 726 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Allegro | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
| Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Allegro | CL |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5439 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 494 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 800 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 87 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 2029 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 88 L |
