1980 Austin Allegro vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 750 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Allegro | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | Allegro | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 112 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1600 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2540 mm |
