1980 Austin Allegro vs. 2005 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,776 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (258 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 2005 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | Allegro | 300 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 258 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 68 L |