1980 Austin Allegro vs. 2006 Holden Caprice

To start off, 2006 Holden Caprice is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 234 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro.

Because 2006 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Allegro. 2006 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1980 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1980 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: