1980 Austin Allegro vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (285 HP) has 226 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 942 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | Allegro | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 285 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1792 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3881 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1826 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2423 mm |