1980 Austin Allegro vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP) has 178 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1310 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Allegro | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | Allegro | XC90 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 237 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 2160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4807 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2857 mm |