1980 Austin Marina vs. 1963 Ford Cortina
To start off, 1980 Austin Marina is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Marina (59 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Marina should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Cortina weights approximately 343 kg more than 1980 Austin Marina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Austin Marina (103 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (85 Nm). This means 1980 Austin Marina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Marina | 1963 Ford Cortina | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Marina | Cortina |
Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 103 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 77.6 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1223 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2500 mm |