1980 Austin Marina vs. 1969 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1980 Austin Marina is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1980 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 430 kg more than 1980 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Marina | 1969 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | Marina | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2960 mm |
