1980 Austin Marina vs. 1989 Dodge Lancer
To start off, 1989 Dodge Lancer is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Dodge Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Dodge Lancer (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1980 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Lancer should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Dodge Lancer weights approximately 320 kg more than 1980 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Marina | 1989 Dodge Lancer | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | Marina | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2630 mm |
