1980 Austin Marina vs. 2004 Volvo XC90

To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (208 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1980 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1158 kg more than 1980 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Marina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Marina. (103 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Marina.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Austin Marina 2004 Volvo XC90
Make Austin Volvo
Model Marina XC90
Year Released 1980 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1275 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 59 HP 208 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 103 Nm 320 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 880 kg 2038 kg
Vehicle Length 4230 mm 4800 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2650 mm