1980 Austin Marina vs. 2006 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Voyager (145 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1980 Austin Marina. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Marina.
Because 1980 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Marina | 2006 Chrysler Voyager | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | Marina | Voyager |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2429 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3050 mm |