1980 Austin Marina vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1980 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Marina.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Marina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Marina. (103 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Marina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Marina | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | Marina | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 180 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 96.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 102 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3010 mm |
