1980 Austin Maxi vs. 1951 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 1980 Austin Maxi is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Hudson Hornet (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1980 Austin Maxi. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 820 kg more than 1980 Austin Maxi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Maxi | 1951 Hudson Hornet | |
| Make | Austin | Hudson |
| Model | Maxi | Hornet |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1485 cc | 4810 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2990 mm |
