1980 Austin Maxi vs. 1953 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1980 Austin Maxi is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Maxi (72 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Maxi should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Jeep CJ weights approximately 132 kg more than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Maxi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Maxi. (132 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1953 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Maxi | 1953 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | Maxi | CJ |
Year Released | 1980 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2040 mm |